Don't Confirm Elena Kagan

President Obama told us what we wanted hear during the campaign and then went right ahead and did what he intended all along.

His appointment to the Supreme Court, Justice Sotomayor did the same thing, lying to the Senate Judiciary Committee about her support for gun ownership and the Second Amendment before voting against it in McDonald v. Chicago.

Are we going to be fooled again by Obama’s newest Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan? There are many reasons to oppose her, including her social activism. The NRA thinks that her support for the Second Amendment is just window dressing. I’ll accept their analysis.

A "no" vote, while unlikely by the whole Senate, is recommended.

Here is an ad the NRA has prepared.

───

For more information on my coaching and educational programs and services, visit my website stevehoffacker.com, or go to my other blog homesalesinsights.com for additional sales tips, insights, and commentary. Listen to my free podcast messages at Steve Hoffacker's Happenings.

© Steve Hoffacker, 2010. All Rights Reserved.

Steve Hoffacker - Consultant, Coach, Author, Blogger, Photographer, Motivator, Teacher, & Strategist - for Realtors, Real Estate Sales Professionals, Home Builders, New Home Salespeople, Entrepreneurs, Small Business Owners, and Independent Sales Representatives.

Chicago Just Won't Learn

The Chicago City Council doesn't get it. The Supreme Court, by the narrowest of margins (5-4) overturned their previous handgun restrictions, so they couln't wait to unanimoisl;y pass an even tougher, equally unconstitutional regulation on guns. What part of the Second Amendment don't they get?

By a vote of 45-0, Chicago bans all gun shops within the city - no restraint of trade here. Are liquor stores and auto dealers allowed to remain open? Seems like deaths and injuries result from those products also.

It is now a crime to leave your home with a gun in your hand - this includes going onto your porch, patio, or into your garage. Criminals just need to stay in you garage or yard and you are powerless to defend yourself.

Question - if you can't carry a gun outside the living space of your home (and you could argue that the garage and porches are part of that), hasn't your Second Amendment right to "bear" arms been infringed?

It's now also illegal for a person to own more than one handgun. Why? How does pass the "keep" arms test? It doesn't.

Any new gun purchases by a city resident - purchaseed someplace besides Chicago (nice way to encourage retail business in the city, by the way) - would require the gun owner to complete a 4-hour class (is that for each purchase?) and a 1-hour session at a gun range. However, since gun ranges are prohibited in the city except for police use, people would have to do this elsewhere also, again at a revenue loss to city merchants and the city for sales and occupational taxes.

Maybe the Supreme Court should be less subtle next time and tell Chicago it may not pass any law with the word "gun" in it and shall not attempt to circumvent the Constitution. Oh, but the Court really does does want to regulate guns, don't they?

Where is the ACLU?

───

For more information on my coaching and educational programs and services, visit my website stevehoffacker.com, or go to my other blog homesalesinsights.com for additional sales tips, insights, and commentary. Listen to my free podcast messages at Steve Hoffacker's Happenings.

Steve Hoffacker - Consultant, Coach, Author, Blogger, Photographer, Motivator, Teacher, & Strategist - for Realtors, Real Estate Sales Professionals, Home Builders, New Home Salespeople, Entreprenuers, Small Business Owners, and Independent Sales Representatives.

© Steve Hoffacker, 2010. All Rights Reserved.

Supreme Court Gets It Right - Sort Of

The Supreme Court in the narrowest of margins - 5-4 - ruled that the Second Amendment is the law of the land and that Chicago's gun ban was likely unconstitutional - without specifically saying so and throwing it out. They also said that less severe regulations on gun usage and ownership might be constituional.

Are they reading the same Second Amendment that I am? It says "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Regulation is infringement. Banning guns certainly is an infringement.

The Second Amendment is quite clear. Perhaps one could argue that we don't have a Militia like the premise of the Second Amendment lays out. However, that is only the premise, and the actual statement about "the right of the people" has no qualifiers - you must be a member of a Militia, you have to be a certain age or gender, you have to register your guns with the government. No infringement. This means no interference. No regulation.

Maybe they'll actually get it right sometime without the weasel language. How about a clear unequivocal, landmark decision - 9-0 - that affirms the Second Amendment and leaves no room for a challenge?

───

For more information on my coaching and educational programs and services, visit my website stevehoffacker.com, or go to my other blog homesalesinsights.com for additional sales tips, insights, and commentary. Listen to my free podcast messages at Steve Hoffacker's Happenings.

Steve Hoffacker - Consultant, Coach, Author, Blogger, Photographer, Motivator, Teacher, & Strategist - for Realtors, Real Estate Sales Professionals, Home Builders, New Home Salespeople, Entreprenuers, Small Business Owners, and Independent Sales Representatives.

© Steve Hoffacker, 2010. All Rights Reserved.