The new EPA regulation on lead paint is now said to be more expensive and more cumbersome to comply with than they envisioned. it is described by the Chair of the NAHB Remodelers as "a classic case of good intentions resulting in unintended consequences." Doesn't that summarize most everything the government tries to do. They don't look at the bigger picture. They don't look at all the ramifications. They don't run out the scenarios. Are we surprised?
Then, it is thought that the intent of the rule will be largely circumvented as homeowners opt to not employ EPA-certified contractors because of the cost and do the work themeselves or not do it at all.
This was a bad rule from the moment it was first considered. NAHB is lobbying to have the opt-out provision put back in - again effectively bypassing the rule by having everyone opt out of it. By the way, where is NAR on this since new homes are not impacted anyway?
Whenever government dreams up another rule we can be sure that it will have unintended consequences, that it will be more expensive that they project, and that it will be unnecessary in the first place.
───
For more information on my coaching and educational programs and services, visit my website stevehoffacker.com, or go to my other blog homesalesinsights.com for additional sales tips, insights, and commentary. Listen to my free podcast messages at Steve Hoffacker's Happenings.
Steve Hoffacker - Consultant, Coach, Author, Blogger, Photographer, Motivator, Teacher, & Strategist - for Realtors, Real Estate Sales Professionals, Home Builders, New Home Salespeople, Entrepreneurs, Small Business Owners, and Independent Sales Representatives.
© Steve Hoffacker, 2010. All Rights Reserved.
